Kim likes to sketch when she should be paying attention in class. Specifically, when presented with a ‘lemma’ (a proven statement that’s used to prove a bigger statement), she envisions this skittish little llama looking creature.
This week in Crim. Pro. we started talking about probable cause, fifth amendment, etc… and we read the phrase “Cruel Trilemma” as in… “[The privilege against self-incrimination] reflects many of our fundamental values and most noble aspirations: our unwillingness to subject those suspected of crime to the cruel trilemma of self-accusation, perjury or contempt;”1
This brought to mind Kim’s lemma… and I whipped out ArtRage again and the result is slightly less pornographic this time than last time.
There you have it.
Murphy v. Waterfront Com’n of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 (1964)
