The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) has a correct translation of bin Laden’s video which many in the Mainstream Media have mistranslated. The important part:
The tape of Osama bin Laden that was aired on Al-Jazeera(1) on Friday, October 29th included a specific threat to “each U.S. state,” designed to influence the outcome of the upcoming election against George W. Bush. The U.S. media in general mistranslated the words “ay wilaya” (which means “each U.S. state”)(2) to mean a “country” or “nation” other than the U.S., while in fact the threat was directed specifically at each individual U.S. state. This suggests some knowledge by bin Laden of the U.S. electoral college system. In a section of his speech in which he harshly criticized George W. Bush, bin Laden stated: “Any U.S. state that does not toy with our security automatically guarantees its own security.”
The Islamist website Al-Qal’a explained what this sentence meant: “This message was a warning to every U.S. state separately. When he [Osama Bin Laden] said, ‘Every state will be determining its own security, and will be responsible for its choice,’ it means that any U.S. state that will choose to vote for the white thug Bush as president has chosen to fight us, and we will consider it our enemy, and any state that will vote against Bush has chosen to make peace with us, and we will not characterize it as an enemy. By this characterization, Sheikh Osama wants to drive a wedge in the American body, to weaken it, and he wants to divide the American people itself between enemies of Islam and the Muslims, and those who fight for us, so that he doesn’t treat all American people as if they’re the same. This letter will have great implications inside the American society, part of which are connected to the American elections, and part of which are connected to what will come after the elections.”(3)
When I say it was an “incorrect” translation, I’m not so sure it was accidental. Even the liberal moderates in this country will not take ultimatums like this lying down, and I can guarantee you that if this were widely circulated as the threat that it is, Bush would probably pull 3/4 of th electoral votes. The mainstream media knows this, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they made a “mistake” which would cause a lot less impact at the polls on Tuesday.
Supposing this did get out, though, there’s a part of me that feels as though far more people than I’d be comfortable knowing about would be scared and pander to whatever bin Laden wanted.
The bottom line, though, is that bin Laden himself would prefer to have Kerry in office than Bush. Are we going to pull a Spain and give in?
I sure hope not.

November 1st, 2004 at 2:06 pm
I think that regardless of who votes for whom, New York and D.C. will always be at the top of terorists’ lists. That doesn’t mean the bin Laden couldn’t say one thing and do another… I certainly wouldn’t doubt that a mass murdering psycho has the capacity to lie. But DC and NY will vote Democratic, like they always do, and they will remain primary targets, like they always are. This, of course, is just my opnion.
November 1st, 2004 at 2:36 pm
What, you don’t trust bin Laden??
We trusted Saddam to disarm… that went pretty well, apparently.
November 1st, 2004 at 4:44 pm
I never trusted Saddam. Even if he did disarm, that couldn’t justify trusting him after the fact.
November 1st, 2004 at 4:55 pm
Note: Above was sarcasm.